Waiting Period Burdens 2nd Amendment

Posted: December 15, 2013 in The 2nd Amendment Issues, Waiting Period Burdens 2nd Amendment

Judge says waiting period ‘burdens’ 2nd Amendment
BY Bob Unruh

A federal judge in California has ruled in a Second Amendment case that a state-imposed waiting period to take possession of a firearm is a burden on the constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

The ruling came in a challenge brought by the Second Amendment Foundation to the state’s mandatory 10-day waiting period to obtain firearms. The case, Silvester v. Harris, continues.

It was Senior Judge Anthony Ishii of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California who said in an 11-page decision that California Attorney General Kamala Harris “argues that the WPL (Waiting Period Law) is a minor burden on the Second Amendment, [but] plaintiffs are correct that this is a tacit acknowledgement that a protected Second Amendment right is burdened.”

He wrote: “The court concludes that the WPL burdens the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.”
Alan Gottlieb, SAF executive vice president, said the statement is important.

“Judge Ishii’s comparison of the waiting period to a prior restraint is significant,” Gottlieb said. “He further stated that Harris, in her motion to dismiss the case, had not shown that the waiting period law is effective in reducing gun-related violent crime, or in keeping guns out of the wrong hands where the government has already issued that purchaser a License To Carry or a Certificate Of Eligibility.”

Also in the argument was Calguns, the state firearms advocacy organization. Chairman Gene Hoffman said it is “refreshing to see lower federal courts taking the burden of intermediate scrutiny or strict scrutiny seriously.”

“California has such a byzantine scheme of gun control that it can’t justify making people who already own firearms registered with the State of California wait 10 days to buy a new gun after they complete a background check,” Hoffman said. “We look forward to bringing some common sense back to how the law-abiding buy and sell registered guns in California.”

The judge also noted that there “has been no showing that the Second Amendment, as historically understood, did not apply for a period of time between the purchase/attempted purchase of a firearm and possession of the firearm.” . . .

Read more at http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2013/12/judge-says-waiting-period-burdens-2nd.html

Advertisements
Comments
  1. jcoles says:

    The judge is correct.
    Just like a Florida judge was right to nullify college rules that licensed adult students from keeping a gun in their on-campus cars.
    And just like the Texas judge that told certain businesses they can’t forbid legal concealed carry on their presses.

    There are waves upsetting the poisoned pool of laws designed by the Left strip our freedoms — and our ability to resist their tyranny.

    The waves will swell and become a tsunami, washing over the vermin; drowning them in their own bile.

    • Bo Perrin says:

      I do find it interesting that almost in proportion to how the left is fighting to strip us of our weapons the courts seem to be supporting the 2nd amendment. It is very interesting times.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s